Mary Blandy

Mary Blandy

Murderer
1known / alleged victims
Case Facts
Gender
female
Country
United Kingdom
Location
Henley-upon-Thames, Oxfordshire, England, United Kingdom
Date of birth
1719
Age at first offence
32
Characteristics
parricide, poisoner
Victim profile
Her father, Francis Blandy
Method of murder
Poisoning (arsenic)
Date(s) of murder
August 14, 1751
Years active
1751
Date of arrest
Same day
Status
Executed

Executed by hanging outside Oxford Castle prison on November 30, 1752

Case Summary

Case overview

Mary Blandy (1719–November 30, 1752) was executed by hanging outside Oxford Castle prison on November 30, 1752. She was described as having poisoned her father at the behest of her suitor.

Background

Mary was raised as an intelligent, articulate Anglican woman. Her reputation in Henley, where she lived her entire life, was described as that of a well-respected, well-mannered, and well-educated young woman. She was also described as a well-born, middle-class, well-educated young woman. Her father, Francis Blandy, was a lawyer and town clerk of Henley on Thames in Oxfordshire.

Mary was Francis Blandy’s only daughter. Her dowry was proclaimed by her father Francis Blandy to be £10,000. Multiple accounts describe Francis Blandy as prosperous at the time of the killing.

Mary was presented as beginning to consider an advantageous marriage by the age of twenty-six, despite the promise of a £10,000 dowry. At some point, Mary met Captain William Henry Cranstoun. The two intended to marry in 1751. They were described as lovers for six years, meeting often along “Miss Blandy’s Walk” at Park Place across the Thames in Remenham.

Crans toun was described as the son of a Scottish peer and as being on the recruiting service for a foot regiment. He was described as having been forty-six years of age while Mary was twenty years his junior, and as having formed a liaison with her despite being described as devoid of personal attractions.

Francis Blandy suspected Cranstoun to be already married and objected to the match. Cranstoun was said to have married a woman in Scotland named Murray/Anne Murray in 1745. Mary’s parents were described as repelling insinuations made against Cranstoun at times, and as later being influenced by Cranstoun’s claims about his legal situation.

The alleged motive and claimed explanation

Mary claimed that Cranstoun sent her a powder which he said was a love potion to make her father approve of her relationship with Cranstoun. She put the powder in her father’s tea and gruel. Another account described the powders as an “ancient ‘love philtre’” and said Cranstoun told her they would make Francis more compliant. At the trial and at her death, Mary asserted she had not administered poison with guilty intention and that she believed the powders were intended for the purpose of winning her father’s favour to the match.

The offence

Francis Blandy became ill after Mary administered the powder to his tea and gruel (and in another description, after a servant prepared water-gruel and Mary placed powder in it). A servant who had eaten some of the poisoned food became ill as well. Francis Blandy died after a period during which symptoms progressed and medical attendants feared death would be the outcome. In one account, Francis died on 14th August 1751.

Mary was arrested after the death of her father and was later indicted for the wilful murder of her father by poisoning, described as parricide. One account stated that a form of evidence used at trial was expert testimony about arsenic poisoning presented by Dr. Anthony Addington, who tested for traces of arsenic using methods described as rudimentary by later standards. The powders were later found to be arsenic in at least one account.

Investigation and evidence

The trial was described as having forensic interest because there was expert testimony regarding the arsenic poisoning. Dr. Anthony Addington was described as having done testing based on residue for traces of arsenic. Another account described that analysis of organs for traces of arsenic was not possible with contemporary technology, but Dr. Addington convinced the court based on observed comparison that the powder Mary had put in her father’s food was arsenic.

Mary was described as having disposed of Cranstoun’s love letters and as having disposed of the rest of the powders, though servants saw her while she was burning them. In one account, a housemaid named Susan Gunnel rescued some of the powder from the fire, took it to a chemist for analysis, and arsenic was found.

Arrest and pre-trial events

Mary was detained in custody and was later brought to trial at Oxford. One account described her walking around Henley after a detention, being chased by townsfolk over the bridge into Remenham, taking refuge with her friend Mrs. Davis, the landlady of the ‘Little Angel’, before being taken back into custody.

Trial

Mary came to trial at Oxford Assizes on 3rd March 1752. Another account stated she came to trial on 29th of February 1752 and later described her being tried at Oxford on 3rd March 1752.

Mary was indicted for the wilful murder of her father. She was found guilty of murder. One account stated she was convicted after eleven hours, after which she received the mandatory death sentence. The trial was described as notable for being the first time detailed medical evidence was presented in court on a charge of murder by poisoning.

Mary defended herself without a lawyer and was described as making an impassioned speech in which she denied administering poison while admitting she had put a powder into her father’s food and stated it “had been given me with another intent”. The servants gave evidence that they had seen her administering powders to her father’s food and drink and trying to destroy evidence.

Sentencing and timing of execution

After conviction, a sentence of death was passed. Mary was allowed six weeks between sentence and execution in one account. The trial judge’s recommendation to the Secretary of State was described, with mention of consideration by the King and Privy Council at a “Hanging Cabinet.” In one account, Mary was hanged on Monday the 6th April 1752; another account stated execution outside Oxford Castle prison on November 30, 1752.

Mary was described as being given a hearty meal of mutton chops and apple pie on arrival back at Oxford Castle, where she had been imprisoned awaiting trial and execution. In July 1752, the Murder Act was described as being passed, stipulating that persons convicted of murder were to be fed only on bread and water, hanged within two days of sentence, and dissected afterwards; Mary was described as having missed this law and being able to be buried in a proper grave.

Prison life and correspondence

Mary was described as writing in the condemned cell, including “Miss Mary Blandy’s Own Account of the Affair between her and Mr. Cranstoun,” which was described by one legal authority as the “most famous apologia in criminal literature”.

Mary was described as being allowed to correspond with Elizabeth Jefferies, who was convicted with her lover John Swann and hanged at Epping Forest in Essex on 28th March 1751 for the murder of her master and his uncle. A middle class lady visiting Mary was described as being shocked that Mary was sympathetic to Jefferies. Mary’s recorded remark was: “I can't bear these over virtuous women. I believe that if ever the devil picks a bone it is one of theirs.”

Mary was described as asking to be given decency as her execution approached.

Execution

Mary was publicly executed by hanging.

In one account, she was executed in the Castle Yard at Oxford on Monday, 6th April 1752, from a gallows consisting of a wooden beam placed between two trees. She was led out habited in a black bombasine dress, with her arms bound with black ribands. She begged that she might not be hanged high: “for the sake of decency”; she was later described as fearing she would fall when asked to go a little higher. After the rope was put round her neck, she pulled her handkerchief over her face. She was turned off while holding out a book of devotions she had been reading. She was described as “died without a struggle” and as passing into unconsciousness very quickly.

In another account, Mary was executed by hanging outside Oxford Castle prison on November 30, 1752.

Other details

Mary was described as having been detained immediately in her room after her father fell ill, then going for a walk before being recaptured.

Crans toun disappeared and spent the rest of his days in France. One account described him fleeing to France on hearing of Mary’s arrest and joining a monastery, where he died on 30th November 1752. Another account stated that Cranstoun escaped and died in late 1752 in France.

Mary was described as behaving with bravery and penitence to the end, and as being unusual among women executed.

Quotes

Mary said while ascending the gallows: “Gentlemen, don't hang me high, for the sake of decency.” Mary was recorded as saying of her sympathy for Elizabeth Jefferies: “I can't bear these over virtuous women.

Spotted an error, or have more information about this case?